Peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplant. A two-way ticket in an integrated renal replacement therapy model.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) seems to be a good option to initiate renal replacement therapy (RRT), but patients with graft failure choose PD less frequently than incident patients (de novo). OBJECTIVE: To describe patient movements between PD and kidney transplantation (TX) and risk factors for failure of the PD technique. METHOD: Multicentre observational study of patients starting PD between 2003 and 2009 with follow-up up until January 2010. Survival analysis based on switching from PD to HD as an event using Kaplan-Meier (KM) and forward, stepwise Cox proportional hazards models. Hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals (HR [CI]) are shown. MAIN VARIABLE: Switch from PD to HD. Two-group comparison: PD post transplant (post-TX) patients (76) compared to pure incident PD (de novo-PD) patients (830). PATIENTS: 906 PD patients from 19 public hospitals with a mean age of 54.8 years (64.9% male); main ESRD aetiology: glomerulonephritis (25.4%), diabetes (16.7%), vascular-ischaemic (10.7%), interstitial (13.6%) and polycystic (11.2%). Comorbidity conditions: Charlson Index 5.1 (SD 2.4); 21.6% diabetes mellitus (DM), 24.0% cardiovascular (CV) events. RESULTS: Mean follow-up period on PD: 1.85 years (95% CI [1.68-2.02 years]). KM estimation for switching to HD due to PD failure was 5.46 years [4.42-6.50 years]. At the end of follow-up, 88 patients had died, 154 had been transferred to HD and 306 had received a graft (annual rate for patients on waiting list: 0.49 TX per year on PD). The best Cox multivariate model for switching from PD to HD includes: post-TX (HR: 1.63 [1.01-2.63]), DM (HR: 1.69 [1.19-2.40]) and age (1.01 [1.00-1.02]) per year. Post-TX patients were younger (43.8 years vs 55.3 years) and with less comorbidity conditions than de novo-PD patients (DM 18.4% vs 21.9%; CV 15.8% vs 24.7%). However post-TX patients had worse clinical evolution with a rapid decline of renal function (∆-3.88 vs -1.8 ml/min per year); a higher admission rate (0.9 vs 0.62 per year) but similar peritonitis rate (0.45 vs 0.53 episodes per year). They also needed to be transferred to HD more frequently (28.9% vs 15.8%; P<.006) and needed more time to TX (4.8 years vs 1.7 years, Kaplan-Meier). Consequently, time spent on PD was higher in the post-TX group (2.8 vs 1.8 year). LIMITATIONS: Observational study with absence of a standard protocol to switch PD-HD. CONCLUSION: PD seems to be a good first choice technique due to low mortality and high TX ratio in our area. A previous graft failure is associated with a higher rate of PD-failure but time spent on PD is enough to consider this technique as a good option.

[Approach to quality objectives in incidents of patients in peritoneal dialysis]. / Cumplimiento de objetivos de calidad y evolución de los pacientes incidentes en diálisis peritoneal.

INTRODUCTION: In 2007 the Scientific Quality-technical and Improvement of Quality in Peritoneal Dialysis was edited. It includes several quality indicators. As far as we know, only some groups of work had evaluated these indicators, with inconclusive results. AIM: To study the evolution and impact of guidelines in Peritoneal Dialysis. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of each incident of patients in Peritoneal Dialysis, in a regional public health care system (2003-2006). We prospectively collected baseline clinical and analytical data, technical efficacy, cardiovascular risk, events and deaths, hospital admissions and also prescription data was collected every 6 months. RESULTS: Over a period of 3 years, 490 patients (53.58 years of age; 61.6% males.) Causes of ERC: glomerular 25.5%, diabetes 16%, vascular 12.4%, and interstitial 13.3%. 26.48% were on the list for transplant. Dialysis efficacy: Of the first available results, the residual renal function was 6.37 ml/min, achieving 67.6% of all the objectives K/DOQI. 38.6% remained within the range during the entire first year. Anaemia: 79.3% received erythropoietic stimulating agents and maintained an average Hb of 12.1 g/dl. The percentage of patients in the range (Hb: 11-13 g/dl) improved after a year (58.4% vs 56.3% keeping in the range during this time of 25.6%). Evolution: it has been estimated that per patient-year the risk of: 1) mortality is 0.06 IC 95% [0.04-0.08]; 2) admissions 0.65 [0.58-0.72]; 3) peritoneal infections 0.5 [0.44-0.56]. CONCLUSION: Diabetes Mellitus patients had a higher cardiovascular risk and prevalence of events. The degrees of control during the follow-up in many topics of peritoneal dialysis improve each year; however they are far from the recommended guidelines, especially if they are evaluated throughout the whole study.

Diez años deexperiencia del CursoIntensivo Teórico-Práctico de FormaciónContinuada en DiálisisPeritoneal / No disponible

No disponible

Bases teóricas para la propuesta de un ensayo clínicoaleatorizado, controlado y abierto, para evaluarla eficacia de la adición de bemiparina a la solución de icodextrina en pacientes en diálisis peritoneal con trastornos del transporte peritoneal[FRIAT-BEM-2005-01] / No disponible

Considerando todas las investigaciones realizadas hasta la fecha sobre las causas que contribuyen al deterioro de la membrana peritoneal y su fisiopatología, se puede concluir que es de gran interés investigar si la administración de heparinaintraperitoneal puede aportar un beneficio sobre el mantenimiento de la función peritoneal en los enfermos tratados con diálisis peritoneal (DP). Las acciones descritas a favor de esta idea son:1) La inflamación crónica del peritoneo es una causa de alteración de la función peritoneal y la heparina tiene acciónantiinflamatoria.2) La fibrosis peritoneal debida a diálisis peritoneal o a traumatismo puede ser evitada o mejorada con heparina ip.3) La heparina (HNF y HBPM, incluida bemiparina) indúcela síntesis de tPA por las células mesoteliales, lo que supone una acción fibrinolítica.4) La heparina, más la HBPM que la HNF, inhibe la angiogénesis.5) La heparina intraperitone al favorece la eliminación delos AGE en la DP.6) Modelos animales y estudios clínicos de corta extensión han demostrado una mejora de la función peritoneal con heparina.7) Por el momento, no se han encontrado problemas de seguridad en su administración intraperitoneal. Es por tanto una hipótesis verosímil que el uso de heparinaintraperitoneal puede modificar favorablemente la función peritoneal de pacientes en diálisis peritoneal (AU)

Multiple investigations performed on peritoneal pathophysiology during peritoneal dialysis (PD) suggest that intraperitonealheparin might modify most of the causes of membrane deterioration. The actions described favouring this idea are:1) Peritoneal Chronic inflammation alters peritoneal function and heprain has anti-inflammatory properties.2) Peritoneal fibrosis related to peritoneal dialysis or traumaticinjury may be avoided or limited with heparin.3) Heparine induces tPA síntesis by mesothelial cells, which represents a potentiation of fibrinolytic action.4) Heparine, sècifically low-molecular weight heparin, inhibitsangiogenesis.5) Intraperitoneal heparin favors the removal of advanced glycosilation end products in PD.6) Animal models and clinical studies with small series of patients have demonstrated an improvement of peritoneal function with intraperitoneal heparine use.7) Until now, no adverse effects of the intraperitoneal heparinuse have been found. In consequence, it is a plausible hipothesis to consider that intraperitonealheparin may favourably modify peritoneal function inpatients under peritoneal dialysis (AU)

[Theoretical bases for the proposal of a randomized, controlled, open label clinical trial to assess the efficacy of adding bemiparin to the icodextrin solution in patients on peritoneal dialysis with peritoneal transport disorders [FRIAT-BEM-2005-01]]. / Bases teóricas para la propuesta de un ensayo clínico aleatorizado, controlado y abierto, para evaluar la eficacia de la adición de bemiparina a la solución de icodextrina en pacientes en diálisis peritoneal con trastornos del transporte peritoneal [FRIAT-BEM-2005-01].

Multiple investigations performed on peritoneal pathophysiology during peritoneal dialysis (PD) suggest that intraperitoneal heparin might modify most of the causes of membrane deterioration. The actions described favouring this idea are: 1) Peritoneal Chronic inflammation alters peritoneal function and hepraine has anti-inflammatory properties. 2) Peritoneal fibrosis related to peritoneal dialysis or traumatic injury may be avoided or limited with heparin. 3) Heparine induces tPA synthesis by mesothelial cells, which represents a potentiation of fibrinolytic action. 4) Heparine, specifically low-molecular weight heparin, inhibits angiogenesis. 5) Intraperitoneal heparin favors the removal of advanced glycosilation end products in PD. 6) Animal models and clinical studies with small series of patients have demonstrated an improvement of peritoneal function with intraperitoneal heparine use. 7) Until now, no adverse effects of the intraperitoneal heparin use have been found. In consequence, it is a plausible hypothesis to consider that intraperitoneal heparin may favourably modify peritoneal function in patients under peritoneal dialysis.

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of mesothelial cells is an early event during peritoneal dialysis and is associated with high peritoneal transport.

Ultrafiltration (UF) failure is a consequence of long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD). Fibrosis, angiogenesis, and vasculopathy are causes of this functional disorder after 3-8 years on PD. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of mesothelial cell (MC) is a key process leading to peritoneal fibrosis with functional deterioration. Our purpose was to study the peritoneal anatomical changes during the first months on PD, and to correlate them with peritoneal functional parameters. We studied 35 stable PD patients for up to 2 years on PD, with a mean age of 45.3+/-14.5 years. Seventy-four percent of patients presented loss of the mesothelial layer, 46% fibrosis (>150 microm) and 17% in situ evidence of EMT (submesothelial cytokeratin staining), which increased over time. All patients with EMT showed myofibroblasts, while only 36% of patients without EMT had myofibroblasts. The number of peritoneal vessels did not vary when we compared different times on PD. Vasculopathy was present in 17% of the samples. Functional studies were used to define the peritoneal transport status. Patients in the highest quartile of mass transfer area coefficient of creatinine (Cr-MTAC) (>11.8 ml min(-1)) showed significantly higher EMT prevalence (P=0.016) but similar number of peritoneal vessels. In the multivariate analysis, the highest quartile of Cr-MTAC remained as an independent factor predicting the presence of EMT (odds ratio 12.4; confidence interval: 1.6-92; P=0.013) after adjusting for fibrosis (P=0.018). We concluded that, during the first 2 PD years, EMT of MCs is a frequent morphological change in the peritoneal membrane. High solute transport status is associated with its presence but not with increased number of peritoneal vessels.

Diagnóstico precoz, prevención y tratamiento de los síndromes esclerosantes peritoneales / Early diagnosis, prevention and treatment of the peritoneal sclerosis syndromes

No disponible

No disponible

Helicobacter pylori infection: a new cause of anorexia in peritoneal dialysis patients.

OBJECTIVE: Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection has frequently been found in dialysis patients. Chronic infections induce overproduction of pro-inflammatory substances. Inflammation has been associated with cachexia and anorexia. We explored the relationship between HP infection, anorexia, and malnutrition in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 48 clinically stable PD patients divided into four groups: HP+ with anorexia (group I, n = 12); HP+ without anorexia (group II, n = 4); HP- with anorexia (group III, n = 5); and HP- without anorexia (group IV, n = 27). Infection with HP was diagnosed by breath test. Anorexia was evaluated using a personal interview and an eating motivation scale (VAS). The VAS included five questions that are answered before and after eating. The questions concern desire to eat, hunger, feeling of fullness, prospective consumption, and palatability. Biochemical markers of nutrition and inflammation were also determined. RESULTS: At baseline, group I showed lower scores for desire to eat, hunger sensation, prospective consumption, and palatability. They also showed lower lymphocyte counts, prealbumin, transferrin, serum albumin, normalized equivalent of protein-nitrogen appearance (nPNA), and residual renal function (RRF). In addition, the same group showed higher levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and more sensation of fullness than the remaining groups. In the entire series, we found significant linear correlations between the following markers of nutrition and certain questions on the VAS: albumin with before-lunch desire to eat (r = 0.38, p < 0.05), and prealbumin with before-lunch hunger (r = 0.41, p < 0.05) and after-lunch hunger (r = -0.35, p < 0.05). Negative linear correlations were found between albumin and fullness before lunch (r = -0.45, p < 0.01), and between prealbumin and before-lunch desire to eat (r = -0.39, p < 0.05). Negative linear correlations were also seen between CRP and albumin (r = -0.35, p < 0.05) and between CRP and prealbumin (r = -0.36, p < 0.05). Similarly, CRP showed a negative correlation with before-lunch desire to eat (r = -0.38, p < 0.05) and afterlunch desire to eat (r = -0.45, p < 0.01). After HP eradication, group I showed a significant increase in markers of nutrition and in VAS scores for almost all questions. Simultaneously, they showed a decrease in CRP level. Significant differences were also found in lymphocyte count (1105 +/- 259.4 cells/mm3 vs 1330.8 +/- 316 cells/mm3, p < 0.05), nPNA (0.9 +/- 0.16 g/kg/day vs 1.07 +/- 0.3 g/kg/day, p < 0.05), prealbumin (26.7 +/- 6.5 mg/dL vs 33.9 +/- 56.6 mg/dL, p < 0.01), albumin (3.48 +/- 0.3 g/dL vs 3.67 +/- 0.35 g/dL, p < 0.05), CRP (1.16 +/- 1.14 mg/dL vs 0.88 +/- 1.2 mg/dL, p < 0.054), before-lunch desire to eat (56.6 +/- 6.8 vs 72.2 +/- 4, p < 0.001), after-lunch desire to eat (5.4 +/- 2.6 vs 12.3 +/- 2, p < 0.01), hunger before lunch (55.4 +/- 5.4 vs 73.1 +/- 4.6, p < 0.001), hunger after lunch (5.8 +/- 2.9 vs 11 +/- 4, p < 0.01), fullness before lunch (36.6 +/- 10.3 vs 18.7 +/- 8.8, p < 0.001), consumption after lunch (5 +/- 4.7 vs 17.5 +/- 18, p < 0.05), and palatability (61 +/- 5.3 vs 74.1 +/- 4.1, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Infection with HP is associated with anorexia, inflammation, and malnutrition in PD patients. Eradication of HP significantly improves this syndrome. Residual renal function seem to have a protective effect on appetite preservation. The present study supports the hypothesis of the involvement of inflammation in the pathogenesis of malnutrition in PD patients.

Acidosis correction with a new 25 mmol/l bicarbonate/15 mmol/l lactate peritoneal dialysis solution.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a combined 25 mmol/L bicarbonate/15 mmol/L lactate-based solution (Bic/Lac), compared to a 35 mmol/L lactate solution (Lac)--the most commonly used solution for patients in southern Europe--on the venous plasma bicarbonate level in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). DESIGN: This was a randomized, parallel, controlled, open-label study, with patients studied for a period of 3 months preceded by a 1-month baseline and followed by a 1-month follow-up. Patients used the 35 mmol/L lactate solution during baseline and follow-up periods. SETTING: Four Spanish nephrology centers. PATIENTS: Thirty-one (20 Bic/Lac, 11 Lac) well-dialyzed (creatinine clearance > 55 L/week/1.73 m2 body surface area) CAPD patients. INTERVENTIONS: Blood samples were taken for biochemistry tests at all visits. A physical examination was completed at baseline and month 3, and a medical update was completed after 1, 2, and 3 months, and at the follow-up visit. Adverse-event monitoring and notation of prescription changes were carried out continuously. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Effect on venous plasma bicarbonate level. RESULTS: Venous plasma bicarbonate rose by 3.1 mmol/L (confidence intervals 1.6-4.8),from a baseline level of 23.0 mmol/L during the treatment period in those patients treated with Bic/Lac (p < 0.05 vs Lac). The number of acidotic patients (venous plasma bicarbonate < 24 mmol/L) was statistically significantly reduced at every treatment period visit in the Bic/Lac group (p < 0.05). There were no adverse findings with respect to vital signs, physical examination, or clinical symptoms, apart from one death in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The new Bic/Lac solution allowed better correction of acid-base status than the lactate solution.

Comparisons of hemodialysis and CAPD in patients over 65 years of age: a meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis had the aim of studying the available studies on comparison between Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis in the elderly. The final objective was to reach, if possible, evidence for potential differences. In the case that no differences could be demonstrated, contribute to accept that HD and PD are similar techniques to be offered to elderly people requiring dialysis. The question formulated was this: Do we have adequately contrasted data on results for survival, hospitalization rate, quality of life and morbidity on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in the elderly (more than 65 years old)? As data sources we selected eight papers that compared the general results of these two dialysis techniques. Different elements were considered in this selection because none reached the two first levels in the hierarchy of sources of evidence, and only two reached the third level--that of prospective studies; this is because an oral presentation of data has been included in a meta-analysis. Another four papers--uni- or multicenter retrospective studies compared the results obtained with PD and HD. The remaining two papers--reports from nationwide registries that compare of mortality rates, adjusted for co-morbid conditions and age, present specific results on groups of elderly patients. Three papers compare particular aspects of the two techniques, including nutritional status, psychiatric and psychosocial aspects and rehabilitation, in this case comparing PD with home hemodialysis patients. Finally, we have included the opinions of healthy elderly people on dialysis issues. This meta-analysis of these different studies suggests that the mortality and hospitalization rate of elderly people treated by PD is similar to that of similar people treated by HD. In consequence, we have no reasons to select either therapy on behalf of the patient. The nephrologist should consider and inform the patient and family about the relative advantages and disadvantages of both techniques and tailor dialysis technique choice to the specific individual to assure the best results. Local circumstances should also be considered.

Catheter malfunction due to spontaneous permcath displacement into medium suprahepatic vein.

One of the last options, when the other possibilities of vascular access present malfunction, is the insertion of a permanent catheter in a central vein, preferentially internal jugular vein. This option is considered when arteriovenous access is impossible. We report a case of malfunction due to a permanent catheter dis-placement solved by vascular interventional radiology.

Risk factors responsible for ultrafiltration failure in early stages of peritoneal dialysis.

OBJECTIVE: To define risk factors for ultrafiltration failure (UFF) during early stages of peritoneal dialysis (PD). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a group of patients whose peritoneal function was prospectively followed. SETTING: A tertiary-care public university hospital. PATIENTS: Nineteen of 90 long-term PD patients required a peritoneal resting period to recover UF capacity: 8 had this requirement before the third year on PD (early, EUFF group) and 11 had a late requirement (LUFF group). The remaining 71 patients, those with stable peritoneal function over time, constituted the control group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Peritoneal UF capacity under standard conditions (monthly) and small solute peritoneal transport (yearly). RESULTS: None of the conditions appearing at the start of PD or during the observation period could be definitely identified as the cause of UFF. There were no differences in characteristics between the EUFF group and the other two groups, except for the higher prevalence of diabetes in the EUFF group. Residual renal function (RRF) declined in all three groups during the first 2 years, with rapid loss during the third year in the EUFF group. This rapid loss in RRF was coincident with UFF. Peritoneal solute and water transport at baseline was similar in the three groups. After 2 years on PD, individuals in the EUFF group showed a significantly lower UF and higher creatinine mass transfer coefficient values than those in the LUFF group. Diabetic patients in the control group showed remarkable stability in UF capacity over time. During the second year on PD, requirement for increases in dialysate glucose concentration was 3.4 +/- 0.5% in the LUFF group, but as high as 25.5 +/- 24.2% in the EUFF group. The accumulated days of active peritonitis (APID, days with cloudy effluent) were similar for the three groups after 1, 2, and 3 years on PD. Interestingly, diabetic patients in the control group showed an APID index significantly lower than the overall EUFF group. Diabetics in the control group also had significantly lower APID versus nondiabetics in the control group (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that certain patients develop early UFF type I. Diabetic state and a higher glucose requirement to obtain adequate UF suggest that glucose on both sides of the peritoneal membrane could be responsible. The mechanisms for this higher requirement remain to be elucidated. The identification of a larger cohort of these early UFF patients should lead to a better exploration of the primary pathogenic mechanisms.

Fracaso precoz de ultrafiltración (UF) peritoneal tipo I / Early ultrafiltration failure in peritoneal dialysis patients

No disponible